4.8 Article

Enzyme-Switch sensors for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunotherapies

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115488

关键词

Affimer protein; Therapeutic drug monitoring; Herceptin; Humira; Rituxan; Yervoy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates a method using an enzyme switch sensor platform for rapid and sensitive quantification of two monoclonal antibody therapies. This method successfully monitored the two therapies within the therapeutic range in human serum.
Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (TmAb) have emerged as effective treatments for a number of cancers and autoimmune diseases. However, large interpatient disparities in the pharmacokinetics of TmAb treatment requires close therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimise dosage for individual patients. Here we demonstrate an approach for achieving rapid, sensitive quantification of two monoclonal antibody therapies using a previously described enzyme switch sensor platform. The enzyme switch sensor consists of a & beta;-lactamase - & beta;-lactamase inhibitor protein (BLA-BLIP) complex with two anti-idiotype binding proteins (Affimer proteins) as recognition elements. The BLA-BLIP sensor was engineered to detect two TmAbs (trastuzumab and ipilimumab) by developing constructs incorporating novel synthetic binding reagents to each of these mAbs. Trastuzumab and ipilimumab were successfully monitored with sub nM sensitivity in up to 1% serum, thus covering the relevant therapeutic range. Despite the modular design, the BLA-BLIP sensor was unsuccessful in detecting two further TmAbs (rituximab and adalimumab), an explanation for which was explored. In conclusion, the BLA-BLIP sensors provide a rapid biosensor for TDM of trastuzumab and ipilimumab with the potential to improve therapy. The sensitivity of this platform alongside its rapid action would be suitable for bedside monitoring in a point-of-care (PoC) setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据