4.8 Article

Umami taste evaluation based on a novel mouse taste receptor cell-based biosensor

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115447

关键词

Umami sensing; Taste receptor cells; Biosensor; Gold nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A self-assembled biosensor based on matured taste receptor cells (TRCs) was developed, which successfully detected L-monosodium glutamate (MSG) and other umami substances, providing insights into taste signal transduction mechanisms and suggesting the potential for biomimetic sensors in intelligent perception applications.
Umami, a taste sensation known for its savory and delicious properties, has garnered considerable attention from both consumers and the food industry. However, current understanding and evaluation of umami characteristics remain limited, presenting a long-standing issue. To address this challenge, we have developed a self-assembled biosensor based on matured taste receptor cells (TRCs), obtained through isolation and culture of taste stem cells. TRCs, as the recognition element, were mounted onto the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) treated with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and poly-L-lysine (PLL). Key parameters including the cell incubation time and concentration were optimized to ensure the optimal performance of the TRCs-based biosensor. AuNPs were deposited onto the GCE surface via 90 s electrochemical reduction. TRCs concentration of 106 cells/mL and incubation time of 12 h were chosen by electrochemical characterization. Using this novel, rapid, and sensitive TRCs-based biosensor, we successfully detected L-monosodium glutamate (MSG) and other umami substances, demonstrating a good linear relationship within the range of 10-9 - 10-5 M between response signals and concentration of MSG stimuli. Our results provide insights into taste signal transduction mechanisms and suggest the potential for biomimetic sensors in intelligent perception applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据