4.7 Article

Citizen scientists can help advance the science and management of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams

期刊

BIOSCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biad045

关键词

citizen science; intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams; smartphone app; hydrological modeling; water management

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses how smartphone applications used by citizen scientists can be utilized to quantify the extent and occurrence of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams. It introduces a new app, DRYRivERS, specifically designed for monitoring such rivers. Through case studies, it demonstrates the potential of citizen science in improving knowledge of these river ecosystems and guiding water management policies.
Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams are the world's dominant type of river ecosystem and are becoming more common because of global change. However, the inclusion of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams in water policies and management plans remains largely limited because monitoring schemes and tools are designed for perennial rivers. In the present article, we discuss how smartphone applications used by citizen scientists can quantify the extent and occurrence of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams. We also introduce a new app, DRYRivERS, specifically designed to monitor intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams. After a year of use, we counted more than 3600 observations from more than 1900 river reaches across 19 countries and four continents. Through three case studies, we then show that citizen science can improve our knowledge of the prevalence of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams in the landscape, enhance hydrological modeling and calibration, and guide managers in setting water abstraction restrictions. Together, our approach demonstrates how citizen science can be incorporated into environmental monitoring to better inform river management and policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据