4.8 Article

Performance and mechanism of different pretreatment methods for inoculated sludge in biohydrogen production

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 383, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129234

关键词

Cultivation methods; Extracellular electron transfer (EET); Extracellular respiration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparison was made between pre-culture bacteria (PCB) and heat treatment anaerobic granular sludge (HTAGS) for hydrogen production, and it was found that the hydrogen molar yield (HMY) of PCB was 21-35% higher than that of HTAGS. The addition of biochar increased hydrogen production in both cultivation methods by enhancing extracellular electron transfers. Fe3O4 did not promote hydrogen production in PCB experiments but had a positive effect on HTAGS experiments due to the different microbial composition of the two systems. Different pretreatment methods of inoculum resulted in significant changes in the sludge community, thus affecting biohydrogen production.
A comparison was conducted between pre-culture bacteria (PCB) and heat treatment anaerobic granular sludge (HTAGS) for hydrogen production, and it was found that hydrogen molar yield (HMY) of PCB was 21-35% higher than that of HTAGS. The addition of biochar increased hydrogen production in both cultivation methods by acting as an electron shuttle to enhance extracellular electron transfers of Clostridium and Enterobacter. On the other hand, Fe3O4 did not promote hydrogen production in PCB experiments but had a positive effect on HTAGS experiments. This was due to the fact that PCB was mainly composed of Clostridium butyricum, which could not reduce extracellular iron oxide, resulting in a lack of respiratory driving force. In contrast, HTAGS retained a significant amount of Enterobacter, which possess the ability of extracellular anaerobic respiration. Different pretreatment methods of inoculum resulted in significant changes in the sludge community, thus exerting a noticeable impact on biohydrogen production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据