4.8 Article

Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of rice straw by amino acid-derived ionic liquid

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 380, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129076

关键词

Methane production; Protein -hydrolyzing bacteria; Acid -producing bacteria; Enzymatic activity; Microbial community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel method of enhancing methane production from anaerobic digestion by using an amino acid-derived ionic liquid, glycine hydrochloride ([Gly][Cl]), as an exogenous additive. The study found that after 40 days of digestion with 5% [Gly][Cl], the cumulative methane production was 73% higher than the control group. The addition of [Gly][Cl] increased bacterial diversity, decreased archaeal diversity, and stimulated the activities of protein-hydrolyzing and acid-producing bacteria.
This study proposes a novel method to enhance methane production from anaerobic digestion using an amino acid-derived ionic liquid, glycine hydrochloride, ([Gly][Cl]), as an exogenous additive. After 40 days of digestion with 5% [Gly][Cl], the cumulative methane production was 115.56 mL/g VS, which was 73% higher than that of the control group (without additive). Specifically, the peak activities of cellulase, xylanase, and lignin peroxidase were significantly higher than those of the control group. The addition of [Gly][Cl] increased bacterial diversity and reduced archaeal diversity. Synergistota represented by Syner-01, Fibrobacterota represented by BBMC-4, Bacteroides, and unclassified_f__Lachnospiraceae significantly increased in relative abundance. It suggested that [Gly][Cl] stimulated the activities of protein-hydrolyzing and acid-producing bacteria. [Gly][Cl] also increased the abundance of methanogens and archaea, converting more lignocellulose to methane. Methanobacterium, that metabolizes H2 and CO2 to CH4, was more abundant. Therefore, [Gly][Cl] can improve methane yield as an anaerobic digestion additive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据