4.5 Article

Water molecule ordering on the surface of an intrinsically disordered protein

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 122, 期 22, 页码 4326-4335

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.10.007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The local structure of water molecules hydrating a globular protein and an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) was compared using molecular dynamics simulation. The results showed that both proteins experienced perturbations in the first hydration shell, but the perturbation was more significant for the folded protein. This difference was attributed to an increase in the fraction of hydration water molecules interacting with oxygen in the IDP's first hydration shell.
The dynamics and local structure of the hydration water on surfaces of folded proteins have been extensively investigated. However, our knowledge of the hydration of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is more limited. Here, we compare the local structure of water molecules hydrating a globular protein, lysozyme, and the intrinsically disordered N-terminal of c-Src kinase (SH4UD) using molecular dynamics simulation. The radial distributions from the protein surface of the first and the second hydration shells are similar for the folded protein and the IDP. However, water molecules in the first hydration shell of both the folded protein and the IDP are perturbed from the bulk. This perturbation involves a loss of tetrahedrality, which is, how-ever, significantly more marked for the folded protein than the IDP. This difference arises from an increase in the first hydration shell of the IDP of the fraction of hydration water molecules interacting with oxygen. The water ordering is independent of the compactness of the IDP. In contrast, the lifetimes of water molecules in the first hydration shell increase with IDP compactness, indicating a significant impact of IDP configuration on water surface pocket kinetics, which here is linked to differential pocket volumes and polarities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据