4.5 Article

Environmental conditions define the energetics of bacterial dormancy and its antibiotic susceptibility

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 122, 期 16, 页码 3207-3218

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.06.023

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial cells in a dormant state can temporarily tolerate high concentrations of antibiotics, with different types of dormancy exhibiting characteristic energetic profiles that are associated with survival to certain antibiotics. Understanding the energetic makeup of different dormant states may provide insights into the survival and evolutionary strategies of these organisms under various environmental conditions.
Bacterial cells that stop growing but maintain viability and the capability to regrow are termed dormant and have been shown to transiently tolerate high concentrations of antimicrobials. Links between tolerance and cellular energetics as a possible explanation for the tolerance, have been investigated and have produced mixed and seemingly contradictory results. Because dormancy merely indicates growth arrest, which can be induced by various stimuli, we hypothesize that dormant cells may exist in a range of energetic states that depend on the environment. To energetically characterize different dormancies, we first induce them in a way that results in dormant populations and subsequently measure both of their main energy sources, the proton motive force magnitude and the concentration of ATP. We find that different types of dormancy exhibit characteristic energetic profiles that vary in level and dynamics. The energetic makeup was associated with survival to some antibiotics but not others. Our findings portray dormancy as a state that is rich in phenotypes with various stress survival capabilities. Because environmental conditions outside of the lab often halt or limit microbial growth, a typologization of dormant states may yield relevant insights on the survival and evolutionary strategies of these organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据