4.7 Article

Anemoside B4 attenuates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by upregulating Nrf2 and dampens ovariectomy-induced bone loss

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115454

关键词

Anemoside B4; Osteoclastogenesis; Bone resorption; Nrf2; Osteoporosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AB4 can inhibit osteoclast differentiation and function by activating Nrf2, making it a potential candidate drug for treating osteoporosis.
Increased numbers and functional overactivity of osteoclasts are the pathological basis for bone loss diseases such as osteoporosis, which are characterized by cortical bone thinning, decreased trabecular bone quantity, and reduced bone mineral density. Effective inhibition of osteoclast formation and bone resorption are important means of treating such skeletal diseases. Anemoside B4 (AB4), the main active component of Pulsatilla chinensis, possesses a wide range of anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects. However, its effect and mechanism in osteoclast differentiation remain unclear. In this study, we found through tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAcP) staining and immunofluorescence staining that AB4 inhibited the differentiation, fusion, and boneresorption functions of osteoclasts induced by receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) in vitro. Additionally, real time PCR (RT-qPCR) and western blot analysis showed AB4 downregulated the expression of osteoclast marker genes, including Nfatc1, Fos, and Ctsk, while upregulating Nrf2 expression. AB4 (5 mg/kg) alleviated bone loss in ovariectomized mice by inhibiting osteoclast formation. Furthermore, the knockout of Nrf2 weakened the inhibitory effects of AB4 on osteoclast formation and related gene expression. In summary, the results suggest AB4 can inhibit osteoclast differentiation and function by activating Nrf2 and indicate AB4 may be a candidate drug for osteoporosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据