4.7 Review

IL-33/ST2 signaling in pain and itch: Cellular and molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potentials

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115143

关键词

Pain; Itch; Neuroinflammation; Neuron; Glia; IL-33

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pain is a major characteristic of many diseases and chronic pain burdens patients physically and mentally. Current medications for chronic pain are sometimes inefficient and may cause side effects. IL-33/ST2 signaling plays an important role in regulating pain in both immune and somatosensory systems and is also involved in chronic itch. Targeting IL-33/ST2 signaling holds promise for the management of pain and itch.
Pain is a cardinal feature of many diseases. Chronic pain poses heavy burdens to the suffering patients, both physically and mentally. However, current mainstream medications for chronic pain, including opioids, antidepressants and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs are sometimes inefficient for chronic pain management and may cause side effects that limit long term usage. IL-33 belongs to IL-1 cytokine family and it exerts biological activities through binding to its specific receptor ST2. IL-33/ST2 signaling is very important in both innate and adaptive immunity. Emerging evidence indicates IL-33/ST2 signaling regulates pain in both immune and somatosensory systems through promoting neuro-immune or neuron-glia crosstalk, neuroinflammation and neuronal hyperexcitability. Some very latest studies indicate a vital part of IL-33/ST2 in mediating chronic itch. This work aims to overview the existing knowledge regarding the mechanisms of IL-33/ST2 involvement in pain and itch conditions, considering their potential similarities. We also summarized some key findings obtained from clinical studies. The targeting of IL-33/ST2 signaling holds promise for the development of novel therapeutic modalities in the management of pain and itch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据