4.6 Article

Multi-threshold image segmentation based on an improved differential evolution: Case study of thyroid papillary carcinoma

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104893

关键词

Medical image segmentation; Non-local mean 2D histogram; 2DRe?nyi?s entropy; Differential evolution; DE algorithm; DE; Image

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The scholarly world has shown great interest in medical image segmentation due to its complex nature and important role in medical diagnosis and treatment systems. Multi-threshold image segmentation (MTIS) is a popular technique for this purpose, known for its simplicity and straightforwardness. This paper introduces an improved Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm called AGDE, based on MTIS, which was used to evaluate its high performance at IEEE CEC 2017. Experimental results showed that the proposed image segmentation method outperformed its competitors, making it a promising approach for medical image segmentation.
The scholarly world has demonstrated an immense enthusiasm for medical image segmentation due to its intricate nature and critical role in medical diagnosis and treatment systems. Multi-threshold image segmentation (MTIS) is a popular technique for this purpose, due to its simplicity and straightforwardness. This paper presents an improved Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm called AGDE, which is based on MTIS and was used to evaluate its high capability at IEEE CEC 2017. Comparisons with classical and advanced algorithms were conducted as part of the experiments. An AGDE-based multi-threshold image segmentation method utilizing a non-local mean 2D histogram in combination with Re ' nyi's entropy was applied to segment images from the Berkeley Segmentation Datasets 500 (BSDS500) and microscopic images of thyroid papillary carcinoma (TPC). The experimental results showed that the proposed image segmentation method outperformed its competitors, making it a promising approach for medical image segmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据