4.7 Article

Mild hydrogenolysis of lignin model compound and organosolv lignin over non-noble bimetallic Ni-Fe/TiN catalyst

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106821

关键词

Lignin; Hydrogenolysis; Renewable aromatics; Nickel; Catalysis; Titanium nitride

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the hydrogenolysis of benzyl phenyl ether (BPE) and real organosolv lignin feedstock using NixFey/TiN bimetallic catalysts was investigated. The bimetallic catalysts showed higher activity and selectivity compared to single-component materials, with Ni5Fe2/TiN exhibiting the best performance. XANES analysis confirmed electron transfer from Ni to Fe in Ni5Fe2/TiN, explaining its superior activity.
Lignin is one of the most promising feedstocks for renewable aromatics production. Conversion of such feedstock into aromatics can be attained through catalytic hydrogenolysis. In this work, NixFey/TiN bimetallic catalysts were evaluated in the hydrogenolysis of both: (i) benzyl phenyl ether (BPE) as a model compound for lignin and (ii) real organosolv lignin feedstock under low temperature (150 degrees C) and low H2 pressure (12 bar). All bimetallic catalysts exhibited superior performance over single-component materials and were shown to compose of uni-formly/highly dispersed and intimately mixed Ni and Fe nanoparticles. Among bimetallic materials, Ni5Fe2/TiN possesses the highest activity in BPE hydrogenolysis, which is comparable to that of a 5% Pd/C commercial catalyst while showing significantly higher aromatic selectivity. Ni5Fe2/TiN catalyst also outperformed Pd/C in hydrogenolysis of organosolv lignin, shown by its higher oil yield, greater content of phenolic monomers, and lower content of dimers. This material exhibited good stability in BPE conversion with no noticeable deactivation over 5 recycling cycles. XANES analysis suggests the electron transfer from Ni to Fe, which explains the superior activity observed with Ni5Fe2/TiN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据