4.7 Article

Biodegradable Grubbs-Loaded Artificial Organelles for Endosomal Ring-Closing Metathesis

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 4148-4155

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00487

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of transition-metal catalysts in living cells is a promising approach to facilitate reactions not naturally occurring. However, the usage of metal complexes is often restricted by limited biocompatibility, toxicity, and susceptibility to inactivation by cell's defense mechanisms. In this study, a second-generation Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst was incorporated into polymeric vesicles, acting as artificial organelles, to facilitate intracellular ring-closing metathesis reactions. This is the first example of using polymersome-based artificial organelles with an active ruthenium catalyst for carbon-carbon bond formation.
The application of transition-metal catalysts in livingcells presentsa promising approach to facilitate reactions that otherwise wouldnot occur in nature. However, the usage of metal complexes is oftenrestricted by their limited biocompatibility, toxicity, and susceptibilityto inactivation and loss of activity by the cell's defensivemechanisms. This is especially relevant for ruthenium-mediated reactions,such as ring-closing metathesis. In order to address these issues,we have incorporated the second-generation Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst(HGII) into polymeric vesicles (polymersomes), which were composedof biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(caprolactone-g-trimethylene carbonate) [PEG-b-P(CL-g-TMC)] block copolymers. The catalyst was either covalentlyor non-covalently introduced into the polymersome membrane. Thesepolymersomes were able to act as artificial organelles that promoteendosomal ring-closing metathesis for the intracellular generationof a fluorescent dye. This is the first example of the use of a polymersome-basedartificial organelle with an active ruthenium catalyst for carbon-carbonbond formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据