4.4 Article

Introduced mangroves exhibit less leaf damage and greater performance than native mangroves

期刊

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 3503-3515

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-023-03120-5

关键词

Enemy escape; Enemy release hypothesis; Folivory; Herbivory; Mangroves; Rhizophora

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) predicts that introduced species suffer less damage from enemies during invasion, leading to increased performance in the introduced range. This study tested the predictions of the ERH for introduced red mangroves in Hawaii and native populations in the Caribbean and Florida. Results showed that native mangroves experienced significantly higher leaf damage, leaf loss, and produced fewer twigs and propagules compared to introduced mangroves. Leaf production and necrotic area expansion were similar. These findings suggest that the introduced mangroves have less leaf damage and may exhibit increased growth and fecundity.
The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) predicts that introduced species leave most enemies behind during the invasion process, resulting in less enemy damage and increased performance in their introduced range. In Hawai'i, introduced red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle) convert open shorelines into dense mangrove forests. While previous studies show introduced mangroves harbor a lower occurrence of damage on various plant structures, it remains unknown if the magnitude of damage to mangrove leaves and metrics of performance differ between introduced and native populations. In this study, we tested some of the predictions of the ERH through leaf damage surveys and a year-long damage experiment replicated in 8-10 sites in the native (Caribbean and Florida) and introduced (Hawai'i) range of red mangroves. In each site, we (1) compared the percentage of leaf area damaged, (2) measured metrics of performance (leaf loss, leaf, twig, and propagule production), and (3) experimentally tested how rapidly necrosis spreads on artificially-damaged leaves of R. mangle. Our results were largely consistent with the ERH. Native mangroves exhibited orders of magnitude higher leaf damage than introduced mangroves, suffered nearly twice the leaf loss, and produced fewer twigs and propagules than introduced mangroves over one year. Leaf production and the expansion of necrotic area on leaves were similar. Broadly, our study demonstrates that introduced mangroves experience substantially less leaf damage and thus, may be exhibiting evidence of increased growth and fecundity. Our results may help explain why introduced mangroves continue to be so productive and are considered invasive in Hawaiian habitats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据