4.7 Article

Enduring tensions between scientific outputs and science learning in citizen science

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110141

关键词

Citizen science; Community science; Conservation; Education; Volunteers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a case study that demonstrates how a community-based organization addressed the tensions and challenges of citizen science in a multi-stakeholder monitoring program. The organization responded to these tensions by creating a tiered system for volunteer participation, which aimed to produce high-quality data for watershed management while also providing science learning opportunities for volunteers aligned with their interests and goals. The authors suggest that such a system can support the development of healthy and resilient social-ecological systems by incorporating diverse knowledge sources and perspectives in conservation decision-making.
Citizen science has been lauded for its promise and potential to simultaneously advance both the scientific enterprise as well as science education. Oftentimes, however, citizen science projects struggle to balance these dual goals and negotiate the tensions that arise between them. Many of these enduring tensions center on the tradeoffs involved between producing high quality data while also maintaining engaging learning experiences for volunteers. In this article, we present a case study of how a community-based organization navigated these tensions in the context of a multi-stakeholder, collaborative monitoring program that featured citizen science as part of a broader watershed restoration effort. Specifically, we describe how project organizers responded to tensions in their citizen science initiative by creating a tiered system for volunteer participation. This system aimed to produce high-quality data to inform watershed management as well as a suite of science learning opportunities for volunteers in ways aligned with their respective interests and goals. Ultimately, we suggest that such a system can support multiple pathways for building healthy and resilient social-ecological systems by potentially broadening the knowledge sources and perspectives from which conservation decisions are made.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据