4.5 Article

Biology for biomimetics I: function as an interdisciplinary bridge in bio-inspired design

期刊

BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/ace5fb

关键词

biomimetics; function; adaptation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In bio-inspired design, the concept of 'function' helps engineers and designers to transfer knowledge between biological models and human applications. However, the meaning of 'function' can vary across fields, posing challenges for interdisciplinary research.
In bio-inspired design, the concept of 'function' allows engineers and designers to move between biological models and human applications. Abstracting a problem to general functions allows designers to look to traits that perform analogous functions in biological organisms. However, the idea of function can mean different things across fields, presenting challenges for interdisciplinary research. Here we review core ideas in biology that relate to the concept of 'function,' including adaptation, tradeoffs, and fitness, as a companion to bio-inspired design approaches. We align these ideas with a top-down approach in biomimetics, where engineers or designers start with a problem of interest and look to biology for ideas. We review how one can explore a range of biological analogies for a given function by considering function across different parts of an organism's life, such as acquiring nutrients or avoiding disease. Engineers may also draw inspiration from biological traits or systems that exhibit a particular function, but did not necessarily evolve to do so. Such an evolutionary perspective is important to how biodesigners search biological space for ideas. A consideration of the evolution of trait function can also clarify potential trade-offs and biological models that may be more promising for an application. This core set of concepts from evolutionary and organismal biology can aid engineers and designers in their search for biological inspiration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据