4.7 Article

Electrochemical immunosensing by carbon ink/carbon dot/ZnO-labeled-Ag@polypyrrole composite biomarker for CA-125 ovarian cancer detection

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108430

关键词

Cancer antigen 125; Electrochemical immunosensor; Ovarian cancer; Silver@polypyrrle nanoparticles; Zinc oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel cancer antigen 125 (CA125) biomarker detection method based on electro-chemical immunosensor was demonstrated. The biomarker on conductive composite materials of carbon ink/carbon dot/zinc oxide (C-ink/CD/ZnO) was used as an electrode platform, enhancing the interaction of antibodies (Ab) with the catalytic performance of ZnO. The created immunosensor showed a wide linear range and low detection limit, making it an accurate and efficient diagnostic tool for CA125 and other biomarkers in clinical sample analysis.
In this work, we demonstrated a novel cancer antigen 125 (CA125) biomarker detection based on electro-chemical immunosensor. The biomarker on conductive composite materials of carbon ink/carbon dot/zine oxide (C-ink/CD/ZnO) was employed as an electrode platform by using ITO substrate to enhance the interaction of antibodies (Ab) with supporting catalytic performance of ZnO as a labeling signal molecule. They were a scientist attention for biosensor with chemical stability, strong biocompatibility, high conductive signal, and accuracy. Moreover, the nanocomposite of silver@polypyrrole (Ag@PPy) was used as a potential redox mediator. The labeled construction with Ag@PPy was more accuracy than that of a free-labeled. The created immunosensor was a wide linear range as 1 ag center dot mL-1 -100 ng center dot mL-1 and a low limitation of detection as 0.1 fg center dot mL-1 under the optimal condition. This suggested that the immunosensor is considered to be an accurate and efficient diagnostic tool for CA125 and other biomarkers detection in actual sample analysis for clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据