4.5 Article

Selective construction of dispiro[indoline-3,2'-quinoline-3',3-indoline] and dispiro[indoline-3,2'-pyrrole-3',3-indoline] via three-component reaction

期刊

BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 1234-1242

出版社

BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.19.91

关键词

cascade reaction; dimedone; isatin; 3-methyleneoxindole; multicomponent reaction; spirooxindole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A convenient method for constructing novel dispirooxindole motifs was developed through a base-promoted three-component reaction of ammonium acetate, isatins, and in situ-generated 3-isatyl-1,4-dicarbonyl compounds. The reaction of dimedone adducts of 3-ethoxy-carbonylmethyleneoxindoles with ammonium acetate and isatins, promoted by pi-peridine, produced multifunctionalized dispiro[indoline-3,2'-quinoline-3',3-indoline] derivatives with good yields and high diastereoselectivity. A similar reaction of dimedone adducts of 3-phenacylideneoxindoles yielded unique dispiro[indoline-3,2'-pyrrole-3',3-indoline] derivatives with a cyclohexanedione substituent. A plausible reaction mechanism is proposed to explain the formation of the different spirooxindoles.
A convenient synthetic procedure for the construction of novel dispirooxindole motifs was successfully developed by base-promoted three-component reaction of ammonium acetate, isatins and in situ-generated 3-isatyl-1,4-dicarbonyl compounds. The pi-peridine-promoted three-component reaction of ammonium acetate, isatins and the in situ-generated dimedone adducts of 3-ethoxy-carbonylmethyleneoxindoles afforded mutlifunctionalized dispiro[indoline-3,2'-quinoline-3',3-indoline] derivatives in good yields and with high diastereoselectivity. On the other hand, a similar reaction of the dimedone adducts of 3-phenacylideneoxindoles afforded unique dispiro[indoline-3,2'-pyrrole-3',3-indoline] derivatives with a cyclohexanedione substituent. A plausible reaction mechanism is proposed to explain the formation of the different spirooxindoles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据