4.6 Article

SAG treatment ameliorates memory impairment related to sleep loss by upregulating synaptic plasticity in adolescent mice

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 450, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114468

关键词

Sleep deprivation; Cognition; SAG; Synaptic plasticity; Adolescent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sleep deprivation has negative effects on learning and memory in adolescent mice, but treatment with a Shh agonist can prevent these effects.
Adequate sleep during the developmental stage can promote learning and memory functions because synaptic protein synthesis at primed synapses during sleep profoundly affects neurological function. The Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway affects neuroplasticity in the hippocampus during the development of the central nervous system. In this study, the changes in synaptic morphology and function induced by sleep deprivation and the potential therapeutic effect of a Shh agonist (SAG) on these changes were investigated in adolescent mice. Adolescent mice were subjected to sleep deprivation for 20 hrs (2 pm to 10 am the next day) and were free to sleep for the remaining 4 hrs per day for 10 consecutive days. Sleep-deprived mice were injected with SAG (10 mg/kg body weight, i.p.) or saline (i.p.) every day 5 min before the onset of the 20 h sleep deprivation period. Chronic sleep deprivation impaired recognition and spatial memory, decreased the number of dendritic spines and mEPSCs of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, decreased the postsynaptic density, and reduced Shh and glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (Gli1) expression. SAG significantly protected against sleep deprivation -induced memory dysfunction, increased the CA1 pyramidal neuronal dendritic spine number and mEPSC fre-quency, and increased Gli1 expression. In conclusion, sleep deprivation induces memory impairment in adolescent mice, and SAG treatment prevents this impairment, probably by enhancing synaptic function in the hippocampal CA1 region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据