4.3 Article

Behavioural interactions between sika deer and Japanese serows: are larger and gregarious ungulates dominant?

期刊

BEHAVIOUR
卷 160, 期 7, 页码 661-681

出版社

BRILL
DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-bja10228

关键词

Cervusnippon Capricorniscrispus interference displacement interspecific competition; vigilance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In ungulate assemblages, the impact of interspecific differences in body size and gregariousness on interference competition has not been fully investigated. Field observations of sika deer and Japanese serows revealed that deer did not show aggression towards serows, while serows exhibited antagonistic behavior towards deer. However, serows were rarely successful in displacing deer, indicating that larger-gregarious ungulates do not necessarily exclude smaller-solitary ones. The alertness of serows towards deer suggests a sensitivity to deer presence, which may have a negative effect on the serow population.
In ungulate assemblages, although interspecific differences in body size and gregariousness are thought to have a direct impact on winning or losing in interference competition, this has not been fully investigated. We observed a total of 64 instances of interspecific contact between larger -gregarious sika deer and smaller-solitary Japanese serows over eight years field observations. Deer-to-serow aggression were never observed. Whereas, serows showed antagonistic behaviour, such as walk push and chasing, to deer, but could rarely displace deer. Serows showed higher alertness to deer than deer did to serows. These results suggest that larger-gregarious ungulates do not necessarily exclude smaller-solitary ones and serows are sensitive to the presence of deer. Differences in aggressiveness and alertness between deer and serows may reflect differences in territoriality: serows may be more sensitive to the invasion of deer into their territory. Serows' sensitivity to deer may have a negative effect on their population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据