4.0 Article

Concurrency of additional canals in mandibular incisors and second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars: A cone-beam computed tomography investigation

期刊

AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aej.12787

关键词

cone-beam computed tomography; permanent mandibular central incisor; permanent mandibular lateral incisor; permanent maxillary first molar; root canal configuration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found a concurrent relationship between the presence of additional canals in mandibular incisors and the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars among the Chinese population. The prevalence of the second mesiobuccal canal increased with the number of mandibular incisors with additional canals. Furthermore, when at least one mandibular incisor had additional canals, the presence of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars could be highly expected.
This study investigated the concurrency of additional canals in mandibular incisors and the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars among the Chinese population. In total, 8644 cone-beam computed tomography images from 8644 patients with bilateral mandibular incisors and maxillary first molars were examined. The data were analysed using Chi-square test, binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve. Among the patients with additional canals in mandibular central and lateral incisors, 96.2% and 95.5% of them had second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars, respectively. Additional canals of mandibular incisors and second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars exhibited a concurrent relationship. The prevalence of second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars increased with the number of mandibular incisors with additional canals. Moreover, when there was at least one mandibular incisor with additional canals, the presence of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars could be highly expected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据