Additivity of grouping by proximity and luminance similarity is dependent on relative grouping strength: An analysis of individual differences in grouping sensitivity

It has previously been shown that grouping by proximity is well described by a linear function relating the perceived orientation of a dot lattice to the ratio of the distances between the dots in the different orientations. Similarly, luminance influences how observers perceptually group stimuli. Using the dot lattice paradigm, it has been shown that proximity and luminance similarity interact additively, which means that their effects can be summed to predict an observers' percept. In this study, we revisit the additive interplay between proximity and luminance similarity and we ask whether this pattern might be the result of inappropriately averaging different types of observers or the imbalance between the strength of proximity grouping and luminance similarity grouping. To address these questions, we first ran a replication of the original study reporting the additive interplay between proximity and luminance similarity. Our results showed a convincing replication at the aggregate and individual level. However, at the individual level, all observers showed grouping by proximity whereas some observers did not show grouping by luminance similarity. In response, we ran a second experiment with enlarged luminance differences to reinforce the strength of grouping by luminance similarity and balance the strength of the two grouping cues. Interestingly, in this second experiment, additivity was not observed but instead a significant interaction was obtained. This disparity suggests that the additivity or interaction between two grouping cues in a visual stimulus is not a general rule of perceptual grouping but a consequence of relative grouping strength.

Automated summary

The influence of proximity and luminance similarity on perceptual grouping can interact additively, resulting in their effects being summed to predict an observer's perception. However, individual observers may show different grouping preferences for proximity and luminance similarity, and the additivity may depend on the relative strength of the grouping cues.