4.6 Article

Revisiting Galactic Disk and Spiral Arms Using Open Clusters

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 166, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/acf7c8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes the largest catalog of open clusters in the post-Gaia era to observe the spatial distribution of the Galactic disk. By analyzing physical parameters and kinematic information, the study investigates the migration and filling of the interarm regions by open clusters as well as the rotation speeds of spiral arms. The results suggest that spiral arms in the Milky Way have a transient nature and have not accelerated in the last 80 million years. Additionally, the study finds a solar offset from the Galactic plane and estimates the scale height from the Galactic plane.
We use the largest catalog of open clusters in the post-Gaia era to provide an observational view of the Galactic disk. By compiling physical parameters such as age, distance, and kinematic information, we investigate the spatial distribution of open clusters and revisit the spiral arms and other asymmetries in the Galactic disk. Using young open clusters as a tracer of spiral arms, we map the spiral structure of the Galaxy and find that most of the clusters start migrating away from the spiral arms in about 10-20 Myr and fill the interarm regions as they age. Using the 3D kinematic information on 371 open star clusters, we derive different individual pattern speeds for spiral arms that closely follow the rotation curve of the Milky Way, hence favoring the transient nature of spiral arms in the Milky Way. The pattern rotation speeds of each spiral arm suggest that the spiral arms have not accelerated in the last 80 Myr. Based on the distribution of open clusters younger than 700 Myr above or below the Galactic plane, we found a solar offset of z circle dot = 17.0 +/- 0.9 pc north of the Galactic plane and estimated the scale height z h = 91.7 +/- 1.9 pc from the Galactic plane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据