4.5 Article

Association between gout at midlife and cognitive impairment at late life-The Singapore Chinese Health Study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.104996

关键词

Gout; Cognitive function; Cohort study; Chinese; Older people

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between gout and the risk of cognitive impairment or dementia is not well established. This study found that having gout at midlife is associated with a reduced risk of developing cognitive impairment later in life.
Objectives: The association between gout and risk of cognitive impairment or dementia is not well established. We examined the relationship between having gout at midlife and the risk of developing cognitive impairment later on.Methods: We used data of 16,948 participants from the population-based Singapore Chinese Health Study cohort. Participants were recruited from 1993 to 1998 at mean age of 53 years and re-contacted for three follow-up interviews: 1999 to 2004 for follow-up 1, 2006 to 2010 for follow-up 2, and 2014 to 2016 for follow-up 3. History of physician-diagnosed gout was self-reported at follow-up 1 and follow-up 2, while cognitive function was assessed with the Singapore modified Mini-Mental State Examination during follow-up 3, when participants had a mean age of 73.2 years.Results: Gout was reported by 1281 (7.6%) participants at either follow-up 1 or 2, and 2243 (14.4%) had cognitive impairment at follow-up 3. A history of gout was associated with reduced risk of cognitive impairment (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93). This risk was reduced in a stepwise manner with either increased duration of gout or lower age at first diagnosis of gout (Ptrend <0.001). Compared to those without gout, those with gout for =20 years (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80) and those with age of onset of gout <50 years old (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.94) had a lower risk of developing cognitive impairment. Conclusion: A young age of onset or a long history of gout was associated with reduced risk of cognitive impairment in late life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据