4.7 Review

Comparison of traditional processing and additive manufacturing technologies in various performance aspects: a review

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s43452-023-00699-3

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Traditional manufacturing; Manufacturing materials; Characteristics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper compares additive manufacturing technologies, such as Fused Deposition Modeling, Selective Laser Sintering, Selective Laser Melting, Stereolithography, Layered Object Manufacturing, with traditional manufacturing processes. It discusses the differences in processing principles and materials between laser additive manufacturing and traditional processing technology. The paper also presents the development status of various materials and highlights the advantages of metal products manufactured by additive manufacturing technology. It proposes future prospects and identifies the limitations of additive manufacturing technology.
Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is a revolutionary manufacturing technology. This paper compares the differences between additive manufacturing technologies, such as Fused Deposition Modeling, Selective Laser Sintering, Selective Laser Melting, Stereolithography, Layered Object Manufacturing, and traditional manufacturing processes, such as subtractive and equal manufacturing. The paper mainly discusses the differences between laser additive manufacturing and traditional processing technology in processing principles and materials. The development status of metal alloys, polymer composites, ceramics, and concrete are introduced in the paper. The advantages of metal products manufactured by additive manufacturing technology in mechanical properties and microstructure evolution are highlighted. The paper also identifies the reasons limiting the development of additive manufacturing technology and proposes future prospects, providing a theoretical basis for future research on additive manufacturing technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据