4.7 Article

Preparation and properties of graphene oxyfluoride films

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 646, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158822

关键词

Graphene oxide; Graphene oxyfluoride; Fluorination; Membranes; Water permeation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, graphene oxyfluoride films were prepared by gas-phase fluorination of graphene oxide layers, and the composition and stability of the films were successfully controlled. The resulting films exhibited stable morphology and structure, as well as tunable water stability and water vapor permeability.
Graphene-based films are promising candidates for filtration and separation applications due to their modulable properties, including composition, hydrophobicity, and stability. In this study, we present the preparation of graphene oxyfluoride films by gas-phase fluorination of graphene oxide layers under a dynamic flow of F2/N2 gas (0.35/0.65 vol ratio) at different reaction temperatures (15 degrees C, 100 degrees C, and 200 degrees C). The resulting films exhibited a stable morphology, maintaining their densely packed structure and parallel arrangement of fluorinated sheets. By varying the reaction temperature, we were able to control the carbon, oxygen, and fluorine compositions, as well as the surface functional groups of the fluorinated films. Water stability tests revealed that the films fluorinated at 100 degrees C displayed the highest stability in water compared to other film types. This enhanced stability was attributed to the formation of strong covalent C-F bonds within the film. Furthermore, the graphene oxyfluoride membranes exhibited water vapor permeability similar to that of the original graphene oxide membrane, ranging from 8.7 to 9.1 LMH/bar. These findings demonstrate the potential of graphene oxyfluoride membranes as versatile materials for various filtration and separation applications, where the composition and stability of the membrane can be tailored to specific requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据