4.7 Article

High-& kappa; Hf0.3Zr0.7O2 film with morphotropic phase boundary for DRAM capacitor by controlling H2O dose

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 638, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158078

关键词

H 2 O dose; High dielectric constant; Morphotropic phase boundary; DRAM capacitor; Hf0; 3Zr0

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, the influence of the dose of H2O reactants on the phase structure and electrical characteristics of Hf0.3Zr0.7O2 thin films during atomic layer deposition was investigated. By controlling the H2O dose and other conditions, a high dielectric constant and low leakage current density were achieved in the TiN/Al2O3/Hf0.3Zr0.7O2/TiN capacitor near the morphotropic phase boundary. The dielectric constant remained above 40 with high endurance, indicating potential for future generation DRAM capacitor materials.
For the miniaturization of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), it is necessary to obtain low equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) and low leakage capacitor materials with complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process compatibility. Herein, we explore the influence of the dose of H2O reactants on the phase structure and electrical characteristics of Hf0.3Zr0.7O2 (HZO) thin films during the atomic layer deposition (ALD). By controlling the H2O dose as well as other conditions including inserting alumina, adjusting annealing temperature and electric field cycling, a high dielectric constant of -45 (EOT - 0.54 nm) and low leakage current density (<7.7 x 10-8 A/cm2 at & PLUSMN;0.5 V) are achieved in the TiN/Al2O3 (-0.3 nm)/Hf0.3Zr0.7O2 (-6 nm)/TiN capacitor near the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB). Furthermore, the dielectric constant remains above 40 with endurance >1012 cycles (even extrapolated to 1015 cycles under voltage pulse of 0.5 V @10 MHz) at both room temperature and 85 degrees C. These results are helpful for achieving a high dielectric constant and low leakage for future generation DRAM capacitor materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据