4.7 Article

Surface morphology effects on the mechanical and electronic properties of halogenated porous 3C-SiC: A DFT study

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 631, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157481

关键词

Porous SiC; Mechanical properties; DFT; Electronic properties; Halogens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the electronic and mechanical properties of 3C-SiC nanopores with different pore surfaces and passivation schemes were investigated using density functional theory and the supercell technique. It was found that pores with a higher concentration of carbon on the surface have a larger bandgap compared to those with silicon. The passivation only resulted in minor changes. The mechanical properties revealed that the Only C structures were the most brittle, and H + Cl passivation improved the bulk modulus for almost all the pores.
Silicon carbide nanostructures have been widely studied due to their potential technological applications. However, the theoretical characterization, especially the effect of the surface on the mechanical properties of this material is still underexplored. In this work, we report the electronic and mechanical properties of 3C-SiC nanopores with different pore surfaces and different passivation schemes using a density functional theory approach and the supercell technique. The nanopores were modeled by removing columns of atoms in the [001] direction, thus creating four types of pores, two with an Only C or Si pore and two with a C or Si-Rich pore surface. All surfaces were passivated with hydrogen, then some atoms of H were replaced with fluorine and chlorine. Results show that pores with a higher concentration of C on the surface have a larger bandgap compared with the Si cases. Moreover, only a few changes can be observed due to passivation. For the mechanical properties the Bulk and Young's modulus were calculated and show that the Only C structures were the most brittle and, for almost all the pores, the H + Cl passivation improve the Bulk modulus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据