4.7 Article

Hydrogen sensing capabilities of highly nanoporous black gold films

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 647, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158618

关键词

Black Gold; Black Metals; Chemiresistors; Hydrogen Sensing; Nanomaterials; Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a detailed study on the hydrogen sensing capabilities of highly nanoporous black gold films. The films exhibit fast response and recovery times at low temperatures. Different levels of nanoporosity were prepared and tested to investigate the sensing properties, and it was found that nanoporous black gold is suitable for hydrogen sensing. The sensitivity of the film depends on its nanoporosity.
Hydrogen sensing is a crucial topic for many industrial and environmental applications regarding the green deal and the use of hydrogen as a next-generation energy source/energy-storage medium. Therefore, many different approaches are being used to find sensitive, reliable and inexpensive devices for hydrogen detection. One such approach is the use of chemiresistive nanostructured materials that provide a large surface area for hydrogen adsorption. In this paper, we present a detailed study of the hydrogen sensing capabilities of highly nanoporous black gold films that show fast response and recovery times (0.5 min) while operating at low temperatures (40 degrees C). To investigate the sensing properties of black gold, films with different levels of nanoporosity were prepared and tested to a hydrogen concentration in the range of 0.25-0.95 %. Film morphology was characterised by AFM, SEM and XPS. To correctly examine the nanopores and defects in prepared films, Variable Energy Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy (VEPAS) was used. We found that nanoporous black gold is suitable as an active layer of chemiresistor for hydrogen sensing and that its sensitivity is the function of the film nanoporosity. Possible mechanisms of hydrogen-gold interactions are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据