4.4 Article

TENDL-based evaluation and adjustment of p+111Cd between 1 and 100 MeV

期刊

APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110832

关键词

Nuclear data; Iterative Bayesian Monte Carlo (iBMC); Nuclear reaction models; Model parameters; TALYS code system; File weights

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the proton-induced reactions on 111Cd were evaluated using the TALYS code system and an iterative Bayesian Monte Carlo framework. Multiple random TALYS calculations were performed to vary the nuclear reaction models and parameters. The evaluated file obtained from this process showed good agreement with experimental data and existing evaluations.
Proton induced reaction data are needed in the optimization of various radioisotope production routes, among others. In this work, the evaluation of proton-induced reactions on 111Cd between 1 and 100 MeV using the TALYS code system within an iterative Bayesian Monte Carlo (iBMC) framework, is presented. The method involves the simultaneous variation of a large number of nuclear reaction models included in the TALYS code system as well as their parameters. Each random TALYS calculation yields a vector of calculated values of cross section observables as well as the angular distributions, among others, which were compared with corresponding vectors of carefully selected differential experimental data for reaction channels where data were available. The random nuclear data file with the maximum likelihood function value obtained from combining the individual chi 2s computed for the considered reaction channels was chosen as the parent vector and the starting point for the generation of a further set of random TALYS calculations. This was repeated multiple times until a targeted convergence of 5% was reached. The final evaluated file was compared with available experimental data from the EXFOR database as well as with the evaluations from the TENDL-2021 and JENDL5.0 libraries, and found to compare favorably.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据