4.7 Article

Whole-life modelling of anchor capacity for floating systems: The RSN-CSI approach

期刊

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2023.103671

关键词

Offshore geotechnics; Anchors and foundations; Floating offshore renewable energy; Whole-life geotechnics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Successive episodes of cyclic loading cause the strength of soft soils to reduce and then recover through consolidation. This paper introduces a new macro-model for assessing the through-life changes in seabed strength and anchor capacity. The approach allows rapid analysis of the entire operational lifetime of an anchoring system, enabling reliability-based assessments and more efficient design.
Successive episodes of cyclic loading cause the strength of soft soils to reduce, through pore pressure build-up, and then recover, through consolidation, as shown by model testing, field studies and theoretical considerations. These 'whole-life' changes in soil strength affect the capacity of anchoring systems for offshore infrastructure such as floating turbines or platforms. This paper introduces a new macro-model for assessing the through-life changes in seabed strength and anchor capacity as a result of variable cyclic loading and concurrent consolidation. The model combines SN curves for damage accumulation with a critical state soil mechanics framework for changes in soil strength and anchor capacity. These methods allow the full operational lifetime of an anchoring system to be rapidly analysed, encompassing timescales from individual wave-induced load cycles, through to annual seasons and soil consolidation processes. The approach provides a new basis for whole-life modelling of anchoring systems that is sufficiently fast to allow reliability-based assessments via a Monte Carlo method. In soft soils that exhibit beneficial gains in capacity, this method provides a basis for more efficient design through reductions in anchor size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据