4.8 Article

Insights into the effects of zeolite structural confinement on pentene catalytic cracking to light olefins

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 349, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121665

关键词

Alkene catalytic cracking; Confinement effect; Light olefins; Ethene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well-known that the diversity of microporous voids in zeolites contributes to their catalytic diversity. However, the influence of confinement on important reactions like alkene cracking and hydrogen transfer is not well-understood. This study focuses on the role of confinement environment in the conversion of pentene. The findings suggest that smaller voids with stronger van der Waals stabilization and higher entropies favor monomolecular cracking, leading to enhanced ethene selectivity in the cracking products.
It has long been known that the structural and topological diversity of microporous voids confer significant catalytic diversity to zeolites. What is less understood, however, is the insights into the role of confinement on reactivity of important reactions such as alkene cracking and hydrogen transfer. The influence of confinement environment toward the reaction process on conversion of pentene is the focus of this study. Pentene is mainly converted through the reaction of hydrogen transfer, dimerization cracking and monomolecular cracking. The more effective van der Waals stabilization within smaller voids leads to lower enthalpies, and the transition state of monomolecular cracking retain higher entropies, which makes monomolecular cracking dominant in F-ZSM-5 at high temperature. It is therefore favorable for the enhancement of ethene selectivity in the cracking products. Furthermore, the tighter confinement could strengthen the adsorption ability and weaken the C-C bonds of pentene, which results in prominently enhanced rate of pentene monomolecular cracking, as suggested by the kinetic analysis and density functional theory (DFT) simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据