4.8 Article

Effects of staggered dimple array under different flow conditions for enhancing cooling performance of solar systems

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 342, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121120

关键词

Solar energy; Heat transfer; Dimple array; Cooling performance; Internal channel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of dimple arrays on the cooling performance of solar energy systems under different flow conditions. The results show that the dimple array can promote secondary flows and turbulent intensity, leading to a 47% increase in heat transfer under transitional flow conditions. Therefore, using dimple arrays can effectively enhance the cooling performance, reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and mitigate climate change in solar energy systems.
Enhancing cooling performance of internal channel with dimple array is promising technology for various solar energy systems. In this study, we investigate the use of dimple arrays within these coolant channels as a means of achieving higher cooling performance while minimizing pressure loss. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of dimple arrays under various flow conditions (laminar, transition, and turbulent). Flow measurements revealed that the dimple array promotes secondary flows and turbulent intensity, particularly under transitional flow conditions. Among the tested flow conditions, the highest thermal performance ratio of 1.8 was achieved at ReH = 2000 and 3000 (transition flow cases), resulting in a 47% increase in heat transfer compared to the laminar flow case (ReH = 1000). These results suggest that dimple arrays with transitional flow conditions could be an effective means of improving the cooling performance of solar energy systems and ultimately contribute to reducing carbon dioxide emissions and preventing climate change. Further research is needed to optimize the dimple array design for specific flow conditions cooling applications for solar energy systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据