4.8 Article

Solar-wind energy complementary coupling realizes magnetic-field assisted efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 334, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122858

关键词

Photocatalysis; Muti-field coupling; TiO2; Z-scheme; CO2 reduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We synthesized a Z-scheme monolithic photocatalyst using copper foam as a support, incorporating Cu2O and Ag nanoparticles. The designed catalysts, with efficient charge separation, exhibited superior photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction, yielding a maximum rate of 25.58 μmol•g-1•h-1. Additionally, we developed a solar-wind energy complementary device that facilitated strong coupling of the magnetic field and photocatalytic reaction. This study provides an ideal approach for enhancing photocatalytic CO2 reduction through multi-field coupling and demonstrates the potential of solar-wind energy coupled photocatalysis.
We report the synthesis of a Z-scheme monolithic photocatalyst in the form of copper foam (CF) supported TiO2 combining Cu2O and Ag nanoparticles (CF@TiO2/Cu2O-Ag). The designed catalysts with efficient charge sepa-ration show superior photocatalytic activity toward CO2 reduction, with a maximum CO yielding rate of 25.58 & mu;mol & BULL;g-1 & BULL;h-1. More importantly, we develop a solar-wind energy complementary device, which enables the strong coupling of the magnetic field into the photocatalytic reaction. Specifically, the in-situ space electric field generated from the wind-driven induced electromotive force further enhances the separation and transportation of photogenerated charge carriers in the Z-scheme system. The productivity of CO in the proof-of-concept device based on the use of CF@TiO2/Cu2O-Ag catalyst reaches 71.66 & mu;mol & BULL;g-1 & BULL;h-1. This study provides an ideal approach for reinforcing photocatalytic CO2 reduction through muti-field coupling and highlights the prospect of solar-wind energy coupled photocatalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据