4.4 Article

Tannin Removal of Cashew Apple Juice by Powdered Gelatin Treatment and Its Utilization in Bacterial Cellulose Production

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04632-5

关键词

Cashew apple juice; Tannin removal; Waste utilization; Bacterial cellulose; Bacterial isolate; Microstructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used powdered gelatin at different levels to treat cashew apple juice and remove tannins. The addition of 5% gelatin was found to remove 99.2% of condensed tannins without affecting the reducing sugars of the juice. The tannin-free juice was then fermented with different bacterial strains, resulting in higher bacterial cellulose production from the KS strain compared to the GE strain, although the GE strain showed higher viability after fermentation.
In this study, cashew apple juice was treated with different levels of powdered gelatin (2%, 5%, and 10%) to remove tannins. The results showed that the addition of 5% gelatin removed 99.2% of condensed tannins while did not affect reducing sugars of juice. Subsequently, tannin-free cashew apple juice (CA) was aerobically fermented for 14 days with Komagataeibacter saccharivorans strain 1.1 (KS) and Gluconacetobacter entanii HWW100 (GE) in comparison with Hestrin-Schramm (HS) medium as control. The dry weight of bacterial cellulose (BC) obtained from the KS strain (2.12 and 1.48 g/L for CA and HS media, respectively) was higher than that from the GE strain (0.69 and 1.21 g/L for CA and HS media, respectively). Although GE showed low BC production yield, its viability in both media after 14-day fermentation was notable (6.06-7.21 log CFU/mL) compared to KS strain (1.90-3.30 log CFU/mL). In addition, the XRD and FT-IR analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the crystallinity and functional groups of BC films when cultured on CA and HS medium, while the morphology by SEM exhibited the phenolic molecules on the film surface. Cashew apple juice has been shown to be a viable and cost-effective medium for the BC production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据