4.5 Article

Tickling and its effects on the affective states of laying hens

期刊

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105984

关键词

Laying hens; Handling; Tickling; Affective states; Judgement bias

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human-animal interactions in the livestock industry can have a significant impact on the welfare and productivity of animals. This study aimed to test if tactile stimulation, similar to tickling, would induce changes in the affective states of laying hens. The study found that the specific form of tactile stimulation administered did not appear to be perceived as positive by the hens. The behavioral assay used in the study may not have been sensitive enough to detect any effects, or other factors such as different interactions or timing of the treatment may have a greater impact.
Human-animal interactions may significantly influence the productivity and welfare of animals in the livestock industry. The nature of manipulation influences the physiology and behaviour of animals positively or negatively. To improve animal welfare, it is important to not only reduce unwanted negative states (fear, pain, suffering) but also to induce positive affective states in animals. Tickling has been described in multiple studies to evoke positive affective states in rats. We tested whether a similar form of tactile stimulation induces changes in the valence of affective states of laying hens using an operant judgement bias test. Sixteen laying hens housed in deep litter pens were divided into two groups with different forms of manipulation: a handled group (n = 8) or a tickled group (n = 8). First, the animals were trained to discriminate between the positive (PS, pecks rewarded with mealworms) and negative stimuli (NS, pecks punished with white noise) in a visual discrimination task (Go/ NoGo). They were then subjected to the judgement bias test, in which responses to PS, NS and ambiguous middle stimulus (MS) were recorded. All hens successfully learned to discriminate between PS and NS. The treatment did not induce changes in judgement bias test performance. Tickling in the manner we administered it and applied in adulthood, did not appear to be perceived by hens as a positive event. The treatment did not affect judgement because the behavioural assay was not sensitive enough to detect a possible effect, or chickens did not find the tickling as administered to be positive enough. Perhaps the other more playful interactions with hens, a larger dosage or the treatment at an early period of life could have greater impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据