4.4 Article

Risk Stratification and Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 526-535

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15625622

关键词

randomized trial methodology; risk stratification; provider decision making; shared decision making

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [RO1 CA131197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Eliciting patient preferences within the context of shared decision making has been advocated for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet providers often fail to comply with patient preferences that differ from their own. Purpose. To determine whether risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) influences provider willingness to comply with patient preferences when selecting a desired CRC screening option. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting/Participants. Asymptomatic, average-risk patients due for CRC screening in an urban safety net health care setting. Intervention. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a decision aid alone (n = 168) or decision aid plus risk assessment (n = 173) arm between September 2012 and September 2014. Outcomes. The primary outcome was concordance between patient preference and test ordered; secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with the decision-making process, screening intentions, test completion rates, and provider satisfaction. Results. Although providers perceived risk stratification to be useful in selecting an appropriate screening test for their average-risk patients, no significant differences in concordance were observed between the decision aid alone and decision aid plus risk assessment groups (88.1% v. 85.0%, P = 0.40) or high- and low-risk groups (84.5% v. 87.1%, P = 0.51). Concordance was highest for colonoscopy and relatively low for tests other than colonoscopy, regardless of study arm or risk group. Failure to comply with patient preferences was negatively associated with satisfaction with the decision-making process, screening intentions, and test completion rates. Limitations. Single-institution setting; lack of provider education about the utility of risk stratification into their decision making. Conclusions. Providers perceived risk stratification to be useful in their decision making but often failed to comply with patient preferences for tests other than colonoscopy, even among those deemed to be at low risk of ACN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据