4.5 Article

Hybrid data assimilation methods, Part I: Numerical comparison between GEIM and PBDW

期刊

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2023.109864

关键词

GEIM; PBDW; Model order reduction; Data assimilation; Thermal hydraulics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid Data Assimilation (HDA) methods integrate Model Order Reduction (MOR) techniques into a Data Assimilation (DA) framework to combine mathematical models and experimental data. This paper focuses on the numerical formulation of HDA techniques and the impact of noisy data using the Generalised Empirical Interpolation Method (GEIM) and the Parameterised-Background Data-Weak (PBDW) formulation. Results show the effectiveness of both algorithms in reconstructing the system state and assessing the effect of noise on the available data.
Hybrid Data Assimilation (HDA) methods are a class of numerical methods that aim at integrating Model Order Reduction (MOR) techniques into a Data Assimilation (DA) framework, thus combining mathematical models and experimental data. The objective is to reduce the solution time using MOR algorithms whilst keeping the accuracy of the models at the desired level using observations, which serve as an update to the a priori prediction of the model. This two-part work investigated HDA techniques by applying them to two classes of problems: numerical benchmark cases (part 1) and experimental facilities (part 2). In particular, this paper discusses the former, focusing on the numerical formulation of the methodologies and on the effect of noisy data. Indeed, real-world experimental data are always polluted by errors and uncertainties; therefore, it is critical to first assess the performance of these techniques on numerical benchmark cases with the artificial introduction of random noise before applying them to real-world experimental facilities. As such, this paper applies the Generalised Empirical Interpolation Method (GEIM) and the Parameterised-Background Data-Weak (PBDW) formulation to a non-adiabatic airflow over the classical computational fluid-dynamics benchmark of the 3D Backward Facing Step (BFS). Results show how both algorithms are valuable tools to reconstruct the state of the system when measurements are available, whilst assessing the effect of noise on the available data; in particular, the GEIM is a bit better than the PBDW since a lower reconstruction error is achieved with fewer sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据