4.5 Review

The application of lag times in cancer pharmacoepidemiology: a narrative review

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 25-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.004

关键词

Cancer; Neoplasms; Latency; Induction period; Pharmacoepidemiology; Lag time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing utilization of medications worldwide, there is a growing opportunity and need for robust studies evaluating drug-cancer associations. Using lag times is an important methodology in such studies. This review discusses the reasons for using lag times, the long latency period of cancer, and practical advice for implementing lag periods.
Purpose: With the increasing utilization of medications worldwide, coupled with the increasing availability of long-term data, there is a growing opportunity and need for robust studies evaluating drug-cancer associations. One methodology of importance in such studies is the application of lag times. Methods: In this narrative review, we discuss the main reasons for using lag times. Results: Namely, we discuss the typically long latency period of cancer concerning both tumor promoter and initiator effects and outline why cancer latency is a key consideration when choosing a lag time. We also discuss how the use of lag times can help reduce protopathic and detection bias. Finally, we present practical advice for implementing lag periods. Conclusions: In general, we recommend that researchers consider the information that generated the hypothesis as well as clinical and biological knowledge to inform lag period selection. In addition, given that latency periods are usually unknown, we also advocate that researchers examine multiple lag periods in sensitivity analyses as well as duration analyses and flexible modeling approaches. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据