Using AI Tools in Writing Peer Review Reports: Should Academic Journals Embrace the Use of ChatGPT?

This letter highlights a pressing issue regarding the absence of established editorial policies for the utilization of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) in the peer review process. The increasing adoption of AI tools in academic publishing necessitates the formulation of standardized guidelines to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. Without clear editorial policies, there is a threat of compromising the integrity of the peer review process and undermining the credibility of academic publications. Urgent attention is needed to address this gap and establish robust protocols that govern the use of AI tools in peer review.

Automated summary

This letter raises concerns about the lack of established editorial policies for the utilization of AI tools such as ChatGPT in the peer review process. The growing adoption of AI tools in academic publishing calls for standardized guidelines to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. Without clear editorial policies, there is a risk of compromising the integrity of peer review and undermining the credibility of academic publications. Urgent attention is required to address this gap and establish robust protocols governing the use of AI tools in peer review.