4.5 Article

A Millifluidic Chamber for Controlled Shear Stress Testing: Application to Microbial Cultures

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03361-4

关键词

Cell adhesion; Flow-exposed cell cultures; Computational fluid dynamics; In vitro models; Human gut microbiota

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to develop a millifluidic device to investigate the influence of shear stress on tissue and bacterial models, overcoming the limitations of previous similar devices. The results suggest that this approach can serve as a suitable testbench to evaluate the shear stress faced by cells or microorganisms in culture conditions.
In vitro platforms such as bioreactors and microfluidic devices are commonly designed to engineer tissue models as well as to replicate the crosstalk between cells and microorganisms hosted in the human body. These systems promote nutrient supply and waste removal through culture medium recirculation; consequently, they intrinsically expose cellular structures to shear stress, be it a desired mechanical stimulus to drive the cell fate or a potential inhibitor for the model maturation. Assessing the impact of shear stress on cellular or microbial cultures thus represents a crucial step to define proper environmental conditions for in vitro models. In this light, the aim of this study was to develop a millifluidic device enabling to generate fully controlled shear stress profiles for quantitatively probing its influence on tissue or bacterial models, overcoming the limitations of previous reports proposing similar devices. Relying on this millifluidic tool, we present a systematic methodology to test how adherent cellular structures react to shear forces, which was applied to the case of microbial biofilms as a proof of concept. The results obtained suggest our approach as a suitable testbench to evaluate culture conditions in terms of shear stress faced by cells or microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据