4.8 Article

Discovering Dynamic Plant Enzyme Complexes in Yeast for Kratom Alkaloid Pathway Identification

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202307995

关键词

Biosynthesis; Monoterpene Indole Alkaloids; Natural Products; Pathway Discovery; Plant Enzymes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discovering natural product biosynthetic pathways of medicinal plants is challenging. In this study, a yeast-based screening method was developed to capture the protein-protein interactions (PPI) between plant enzymes. Combining this method with plant multiomics analysis, four enzyme complexes and their organized pathways were discovered from kratom. This study highlights the opportunity of leveraging post-translational regulation features to discover novel plant natural product biosynthetic pathways.
Discovering natural product biosynthetic pathways of medicinal plants is challenging and laborious. Capturing the coregulation patterns of pathway enzymes, particularly transcriptomic regulation, has proven an effective method to accelerate pathway identification. In this study, we developed a yeast-based screening method to capture the protein-protein interactions (PPI) between plant enzymes, which is another useful pattern to complement the prevalent approach. Combining this method with plant multiomics analysis, we discovered four enzyme complexes and their organized pathways from kratom, an alkaloid-producing plant. The four pathway branches involved six enzymes, including a strictosidine synthase, a strictosidine & beta;-D-glucosidase (MsSGD), and four medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductases (MsMDRs). PPI screening selected six MsMDRs interacting with MsSGD from 20 candidates predicted by multiomics analysis. Four of the six MsMDRs were then characterized as functional, indicating the high selectivity of the PPI screening method. This study highlights the opportunity of leveraging post-translational regulation features to discover novel plant natural product biosynthetic pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据