4.8 Article

Large Interlayer Distance and Heteroatom-Doping of Graphite Provide New Insights into the Dual-Ion Storage Mechanism in Dual-Carbon Batteries

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202307083

关键词

Dual-Ion Batteries; Graphite; Heteroatomic Doping; Ultra-Large Interlayer Distance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the effects of material structures on the anion storage behavior in dual-ion batteries (DIBs) by synthesizing graphite with an ultra-large interlayer distance and heteroatomic doping. The large interlayer distance of 0.51 nm provides more space for anion storage, while the doping of heteroatoms reduces the energy barriers for anion intercalation and migration and enhances rapid ionic storage at interfaces simultaneously. The DIBs composed of carbon cathode and lithium anode achieve an ultra-high capacity of 240 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 100 mA g(-1), while the dual-carbon batteries (DCBs) using graphite as both cathode and anode cycle steadily for 2400 times at a current density of 1 A g(-1).
Dual-ion batteries (DIBs) is a promising technology for large-scale energy storage. However, it is still questionable how material structures affect the anion storage behavior. In this paper, we synthesis graphite with an ultra-large interlayer distance and heteroatomic doping to systematically investigate the combined effects on DIBs. The large interlayer distance of 0.51 nm provides more space for anion storage, while the doping of the heteroatoms reduces the energy barriers for anion intercalation and migration and enhances rapid ionic storage at interfaces simultaneously. Based on the synergistic effects, the DIBs composed of carbon cathode and lithium anode afford ultra-high capacity of 240 mAh g(-1) at current density of 100 mA g(-1). Dual-carbon batteries (DCBs) using the graphite as both of cathode and anode steadily cycle 2400 times at current density of 1 A g(-1). Hence, this work provides a reference to the strategy of material designs of DIBs and DCBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据