4.8 Article

Environment-Responsive Peptide Dimers Bind and Stabilize Double-Stranded RNA

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202308028

关键词

RNA Delivery; RNA Stabilization; RNA/Peptide Complex; Reversible Dimerization; TAV2b

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Double-stranded RNAs (dsRNA), potential therapeutic molecules, suffer from low stability and poor cellular uptake. Researchers have designed dimeric stapled peptides based on the RNA-binding protein TAV2b, which can bind and stabilize dsRNA, protect it from degradation, and promote cellular uptake. These findings demonstrate the potential of peptide-based RNA binders for the stabilization and protection of dsRNA, expanding the applicability of dsRNA for therapeutic purposes.
Double-stranded RNAs (dsRNA) possess immense potential for biomedical applications. However, their therapeutic utility is limited by low stability and poor cellular uptake. Different strategies have been explored to enhance the stability of dsRNA, including the incorporation of modified nucleotides, and the use of diverse carrier systems. Nevertheless, these have not resulted in a broadly applicable approach thereby preventing the wide-spread application of dsRNA for therapeutic purposes. Herein, we report the design of dimeric stapled peptides based on the RNA-binding protein TAV2b. These dimers are obtained via disulfide formation and mimic the natural TAV2b assembly. They bind and stabilize dsRNA in the presence of serum, protecting it from degradation. In addition, peptide binding also promotes cellular uptake of dsRNA. Importantly, peptide dimers monomerize under reducing conditions which results in a loss of RNA binding. These findings highlight the potential of peptide-based RNA binders for the stabilization and protection of dsRNA, representing an appealing strategy towards the environment-triggered release of RNA. This can broaden the applicability of dsRNA, such as short interfering RNAs (siRNA), for therapeutic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据