4.7 Article

Multi-block DD-SIMCA as a high-level data fusion tool

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341328

关键词

Cumulative analytical signal; High-level data fusion; Multi -block classification; DD-SIMCA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research presents a multi-block classification method based on the Data Driven Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy (DDSIMCA). A high-level data fusion approach is used to jointly analyze data collected from different analytical instruments. The proposed fusion technique is simple and straightforward, using a Cumulative Analytical Signal to combine the outcomes of individual classification models. Any number of blocks can be combined. Despite the complexity of the high-level fusion model, the analysis of partial distances allows for a meaningful relationship between classification results, individual samples, and specific tools. Two real-world examples demonstrate the applicability of the multi-block algorithm and its consistency with its predecessor, conventional DD-SIMCA.
Multi-block classification method based on the Data Driven Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy (DDSIMCA) is presented. A high-level data fusion approach is used for the joint analysis of data collected with the help of different analytical instruments. The proposed fusion technique is very simple and straightforward. It uses a Cumulative Analytical Signal which is a combination of outcomes of the individual classification models. Any number of blocks can be combined. Although the high-level fusion eventually leads to a rather complex model, the analysis of partial distances makes it possible to establish a meaningful relationship between the classification results and the influence of individual samples and specific tools.Two real world examples are used to demonstrate the applicability of the multi-block algorithm and the consistency of the multi-block method with its predecessor, a conventional DD-SIMCA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据