4.7 Article

DNA strand displacement and TdT-Mediated DNA extension for swift, convenient, and quantitative evaluation of sperm DNA integrity and its clinical implications

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341821

关键词

Terminal transferase; Strand displacement probe; Sperm DNA integrity; DNA fragmentation index; Mean number of DNA breaks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A detection system based on terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and DNA strand displacement fluorescent probe was developed to quantitatively detect breakpoints at the DNA molecular level. The system showed reasonable correlation and better prediction efficiency compared to the widely accepted SCSA method, and its applicability was proven in assisted reproductive technology procedures.
DNA integrity is crucial for the clinical pregnancy outcome and offspring health, while detection methods currently used (comet assay, TUNNEL assay, SCSA, etc.) can only provide the ratio of positive sperms at the cellular level and are unable to quantitatively detect the breakpoints at the DNA molecular level. Herein, we developed a detection system based on terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and DNA strand displacement fluorescent probe, which could efficiently and conveniently measure the number of 3 '-OH (equivalent to the number of breakpoints). We further investigated the use of this technique in assisted reproduction after completing the principle verification, system optimization, and research on analytical performance. The detection system was shown to have a good linear range from 0.01 nM to 4 nM, using single-stranded DNA with 3 '-OH end as the calibrator. The system underwent thorough optimization for stability and accuracy. In comparison to the widely accepted index DFI detected by SCSA, the new system demonstrated reasonable correlation and better prediction efficiency. Its applicability was also proven through its use in assisted reproductive technology procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据