4.5 Article

Novel use of motor-sparing genicular nerve blocks for knee injuries in the emergency department

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.038

关键词

Motor-sparing block; Nerve block; Knee injuries; Genicular nerve block; Emergency department

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nerve blocks have emerged as promising options for targeted pain relief in the Emergency Department, providing effective analgesia without compromising motor function. The successful use of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blocks (GNBs) in this case series demonstrates their potential as an alternative to traditional nerve blocks and opioid-based pain control strategies in the ED.
Knee injuries are quite prevalent in the Emergency Department (ED) and often present with severe pain, neces-sitating effective pain management strategies. Traditional pain management approaches, including opioid medications, may carry undesirable side effects and potential risks, leading to the growing interest in non-opioid alternatives. Nerve blocks have emerged as promising options for targeted pain relief in the ED. Motor-sparing nerve blocks have gained importance due to their ability to provide effective analgesia without compromising motor function [1]. The case series demonstrates the successful use of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blocks(GNB) in the Emer-gency Department, providing targeted pain relief without compromising motor function. GNBs offer a valuable alternative to traditional nerve blocks(femoral, fascia iliaca, adductor canal) and opioid-based pain control strategies in the ED. As the evidence base grows, GNBs may become a more established component of ED pain management protocols, enhancing patient outcomes and safety in the management of acute knee injuries. The incorporation of ultrasound-guided motor-sparing nerve blocks in ED pain management protocols may hold great promise in optimising pain control and enhancing patient comfort. Trial Registration: N/A. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据