4.2 Article

Sarcopenic obesity is not associated with sexual dysfunction in older adults: a cross-sectional study

期刊

AGING MALE
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2023.2252502

关键词

Aged; sarcopenia; sexual health; obesity; prevalence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the frequency of sexual dysfunction (SD) among older adults and its association with body composition abnormalities such as sarcopenia, obesity, and sarcopenic obesity. The results showed that approximately 66.7% of older adults had SD, but it was not associated with sarcopenia, obesity, or sarcopenic obesity.
Background: This study aimed to investigate the frequency of sexual dysfunction (SD) and the association between SD and body composition abnormalities, such as sarcopenia, obesity, and sarcopenic obesity.Methods: Older adults (>= 65 years) were included. Sarcopenic obesity was diagnosed by using newly defined ESPEN-EASO diagram. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria. Obesity was defined using the fat percentile cut-offs suggested by ESPEN-EASO. SD was determined by Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX).Results: Two-hundred and sixty-seven volunteers (64.4% female, mean age 73.63 +/- 6.22 years) participated in this study. One-hundred seventy-eight individuals (66.7%) had SD. It was present in 83.1% and 36.8% of the females and males, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no association between SD and sarcopenia alone (OR: 1.359, 95% CI: 0.650-2.838, p = 0.415) or obesity alone (OR: 0.986, 95% CI: 0.543-1.791, p = 0.963). Sarcopenic obesity was significantly associated with SD (OR: 9.116, 95% CI: 1.173-70.851, p = 0.035). However, this significance was lost after the model was adjusted for gender, marital status, and comorbidities (OR: 4.676, 95% CI: 0.578-37.801, p = 0.148).Conclusions: SD was present in 66.7% of the older adults and was not associated with sarcopenia, obesity, or sarcopenic obesity. Further longitudinal studies are needed on this topic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据