4.8 Article

Mid-Infrared Bipolar and Unipolar Linear Polarization Detections in Nb2GeTe4/MoS2 Heterostructures

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202305594

关键词

2D van der Waals heterostructures; anisotropy; mid-infrared photodetectors; polarization photodetection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detecting and distinguishing light polarization states is of significant importance in scientific studies and industry applications. In this study, a broadband polarization photodetector with high PRs and wavelength-dependent polarities using a 2D anisotropic/isotropic Nb2GeTe4/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructure is demonstrated, showing effectiveness in polarized communication and imaging.
Detecting and distinguishing light polarization states, one of the most basic elements of optical fields, have significant importance in both scientific studies and industry applications. Artificially fabricated structures, e.g., metasurfaces with anisotropic absorptions, have shown the capabilities of detecting polarization light and controlling. However, their operations mainly rely on resonant absorptions based on structural designs that are usually narrow bands. Here, a mid-infrared (MIR) broadband polarization photodetector with high PRs and wavelength-dependent polarities using a 2D anisotropic/isotropic Nb2GeTe4/MoS2 van der Waals (vdWs) heterostructure is demonstrated. It is shown that the photodetector exhibits high PRs of 48 and 34 at 4.6 and 11.0 mu m wavelengths, respectively, and even a negative PR of -3.38 for 3.7 mu m under the zero bias condition at room temperature. Such interesting results can be attributed to the superimposed effects of a photovoltaic (PV) mechanism in the Nb2GeTe4/MoS2 hetero-junction region and a bolometric mechanism in the MoS2 layer. Furthermore, the photodetector demonstrates its effectiveness in bipolar and unipolar polarization encoding communications and polarization imaging enabled by its unique and high PRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据