4.6 Article

Flexural Behavior of Bidirectionally Graded Lattice

期刊

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202300915

关键词

additive manufacturing; energy absorption; flexural behavior; functionally graded lattices; three-point bending

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the flexural behavior of different types of lattice beams and finds that bidirectional lattice beams have higher flexural stiffness and strength compared to uniform and unidirectional lattice beams. The lower strength of unidirectional lattice beams is attributed to the easier collapse of thinner lattice layers on the impact side. Furthermore, the parametric study reveals that the flexural stress and specific energy absorption capacity of bidirectional lattice beams can be enhanced by manipulating the layer density gradient.
This study aims to investigate the flexural behavior of newly designed bidirectionally graded lattice beams with body-centered cubic unit cells made of stainless steel 316 L. Uniform and unidirectionally graded lattice beams are also studied for comparison. All the lattice beams are fabricated by electron beam melting and tested under quasi-static bending loads. The experimental results reveal that the flexural stiffness and strength of bidirectional lattice beams are higher than those of both the uniform and unidirectional counterparts. The unidirectional lattice beams display the lowest strength owing to the easier collapse of thinner lattice layers on the impact side with the indenter. Finite element models, developed and validated using the experimental results, are used to evaluate the effects of the density gradient and the loading velocity on the performance of bidirectional lattice beams. The parametric study shows that the flexural stress and the specific energy absorption capacity of bidirectional functionally graded lattice beams increase with increasing loading velocity and can be enhanced by manipulating the layer density gradient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据