4.5 Review

Short course of intravenous antibiotics in the treatment of uncomplicated proven neonatal bacterial sepsis: A systematic review

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.16972

关键词

anti-bacterial agents; blood culture; neonatal sepsis; newborn; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and harms of a short duration (7-10 days) compared with a standard duration (10-14 days) of antibiotics in treating culture-proven neonatal sepsis. The study included five trials conducted in India and found that the short-term antibiotics regimen may shorten the duration of hospitalisation by 4 days, but evidence for other outcomes was very uncertain.
Aim To evaluate the efficacy and harms of a short (7-10 days) compared with a standard (10-14 days) duration of antibiotics in culture-proven neonatal sepsis for reducing all-cause mortality, treatment failure and duration of hospitalisation.Methods Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for randomised trials.Results We included five studies, all conducted in India (447 infants with a gestational age greater than 32 weeks). Except for one study, all studies were at high risk of bias. All-cause mortality was reported in three studies with only one death reported in the standard duration regimen arm (243 patients, very low certainty). A meta-analysis showed no evidence of the effect on treatment failure (RR of 1.47 [95% CI 0.48-4.50], 440 patients, five studies, very low certainty) of short-term antibiotics. Short-term antibiotic regimen shortened the duration of hospitalisation by 4 days (mean difference of -4.04 days [95% CI -5.47 to -2.61]; 4 studies; 371 patients; very low certainty).Conclusion Among studies focused on infants born with a gestational age greater than 32 weeks, short-term administration of antibiotics may shorten the duration of hospitalisation, but the evidence is very uncertain. The evidence on other predefined outcomes is very uncertain to draw definite conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据